Published on:

Public Consensus on Immigration Reform Policies: Opinions Gleaned from the American Values Atlas

capitolThe consensus between immigration reform policies and public opinion has, to a considerable degree, consistently displayed a quality of disparity. President Obama’s executive action on immigration has received a strong sense of support from three – quarters of the American public. In spite of this fact, Obama’s recent immigration plans have been met with a potent amount of opposition from the Republican sector. 26 Republican governors have taken legal action against Obama’s administration with the assertion that the order that has been issued lies far beyond the boundaries of Obama’s authority. The GOP governor’s efforts have received a favorable ruling from a Republican – appointed judge in Texas. The latter ruled in favor of the GOP governors and issued an injunction, effectively halting the implementation of the immigration reform policy.

The American Values Atlas

The Public Religion Research Institute recently released the American Values Atlas, an online interactive map that paints a detailed picture of the changes inherent in the contemporary American religious and political topography. The AVA is designed to process huge streams of data – culled from an excess of 40, 000 telephone interviews – to provide an unprecedented account of American public opinion at a level that has previously been unheard of. Small subgroups of Americans whose opinions have long been absent from previous surveys have found a mouthpiece through the AVA. The two metrics utilized by the AVA include opinions that cluster around immigration policy and public perceptions on the impact that foreign nationals have had on the country. The results yielded by the AVA are revelatory.

Opinions on Immigration Reform Policies

On a national level, the AVA has produced results that support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Six in 10 Americans say that the best approach for dealing with undocumented immigrants who are living in the country is to provide them with a way to become citizens provided they meet specific requirements. 17 percent of the respondents from the AVA’s sample size say that foreign nationals should be allowed to become legal residents but not citizens. 19 percent of the AVA’s respondents favored the identification and deportation of immigrants. From an economic standpoint, the American public holds favorable opinions on the impact that immigrants have had on the country’s progress. 55 percent of the AVA respondents expressed that the diverse skill sets and work output that foreign nationals possess strengthen the country’s economy while a mere 36 percent state that undocumented immigrants impose a burden on the country because they take away housing, jobs, and healthcare opportunities.

The Question of Consensus

A brief look at the results that have been produced by the AVA reveals that there is a general consensus across states when it comes to immigration policy solutions. Generally, a majority of the residents of all 50 states maintain that a path to citizenship should be made available for qualified undocumented immigrants who currently reside in the country. The staggering sense of support produced by the AVA’s findings provides a stark contrast to the polarized political bickering.  Ideally, the AVA’s findings should steer political leaders to push past partisan ideology to heed the broad sense of accordance that their constituents have expressed on the issues surrounding immigration reform policies.

People with concerns regarding the shifts in immigration reform policies may want to seek legal counsel at the Lyttle Law Firm in Austin, Texas. Acquire more details by visiting their website or calling their offices at 512-215-5225.